6/23/2023 0 Comments Craap research logsheet![]() ![]() Direction from your organization’s decision-makers is key. It is important to point out that the report, while important, is not the end, it simply a means to making better decisions. Not all of your business reports need to be lengthy and high caliber items supported by scholarly sources you might find yourself writing a “quick” report within a day or two where your boss indicates that Wikipedia or some other introductory website (and encyclopedia maybe) is sufficient. This is hotly debated, but it all depends on the purpose of your writing. Depending on your organizational culture, Wikipedia might be sufficient as a source. ![]() Lastly, Flinders University has an excellent commentary below on the use of Wikipedia. Currency: The timeliness of the information. Determining the credibility of the information you find is not always easy - think of the following criteria during evaluation. Critically evaluating the information you find is central to successful academic research. The following video from Wintec Library also discusses the analysis. Not all sources are equally valuable or reliable. Purpose: What is the goal of the source-why was it created?.Accuracy: Judged against other sources (which themselves will need appropriate evaluation), how correct is the source?.Authority: What is the source of the information?.Reliability: How important is the information, and has it been consistently presented?.Below is a summarized form CRAAP stands for: The University of Santa Cruz library has a full breakdown of the CRAAP method. Perhaps the most common and well known is the (well-titled) CRAAP Analysis. There are several tools available when evaluating sources. One may write for various purposes: Informing the reader of an occurrence, explaining how something happened, entertaining. \)ĭescribe the components of the CRAAP analysis process The last element of the CRAAP test is the purpose of the article. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |